It was welcome news that our Chief Justice on Friday, March 12th, at
a public conference related to the state of the Family, opted to raise
the burning issue of our ailing Family Court, a matter relating to which
I have been constantly
contributing both in the print and broadcasting media.
Malta`s Family Court needs a major overhaul, a fundamental restructuring
in every conceivable aspect: this incorporates an adequate place from
where the Family Court can administratively function properly, staffing
professionally trained in every area concerning the Family Law field,
sufficiently structured consulting rooms, monitoring services so as
to assure a link in the proceedings to avoid the chaos that results
regularly at present due to the absurd detachment between the Mediation
and Contentious Proceedings,strategic plan between the Bench,the Parties
and the Lawyers as to how the Case will progress with a Date clearly
earmarked as to when such proceedings will definitely conclude, backed
up by follow-up supervisory sessions particularly where young children
are involved.
Life in its frail humanity is precious.No couple whose marriage or partnership
has irretrievably broken down has any time to lose, much less spend
years on end until the procedures are definitively over: consider by
way of illustration a case where a married mother of two very young
siblings abandoned the conjugal home to go and cohabit with her older
lover himself equally abandoning his wife and children.The Adultery
despite denied under oath was evident to one and all. The husband was
left alone to take care of the two minor, very young children as well
as to see that he retained his job on which his livelihood depended.
In laws had to be roped in to assist. Eleven years after commencing
before the Family Court the Case was concluded before the First Court
with the husband being told that despite that the marital breakdown
was through no fault of his, yet he had to vacate the Conjugal Home
within eight years as the latter was legally the paraphernal property
of the adulterous wife by which time the latter had acquired another
home with her lover from whom she had a child.
By this time,the two young siblings have grown into two fine teenagers
with not one cent being contributed towards their upbringing by their
adulterous mother. Within eight years, the latter gets the Conjugal
Home back,and what is to happen to the husband and the children now
on the threshold of adulthood,majority age? Thrown out into the street
when the marital breakdown was through no fault of theirs, as declared
formally by the First Court? The unfaithful wife then decides to appeal
so as to make certain that by the time the Appeal is determined, the
children would have come of age and she despite having a well-paid job
[ which is denied - her boss is her lover ! ] would never have contributed
anything for her own off spring. The truth has been crowned by an unjust
outcome:it took the obvious nearly fifteen years to be crystallized
and the victimized parties are to fathom out how to commence their life
anew. This case is not a sole instance,but clearly points out the gross
inadequacy as to how our Family Court is run.We talk about the Family
Court but nobody is truly caring that this Court has become the most
burdened with highly-charged cases, delicate issues and consequences
to which not much pratical attention is meted out.
Had there been proper coordination, monitoring and supervision,this
tortuous, expensive, disillusionary and shameful path would not have
been necessary.THE FAMILY COURT is a most delicate and sensitive Institution
which necessitates being equally so treated. The competent authorities
despite being repeatedly exhorted to look realistically into this complex
matter, always shied purposely away from so doing, for `religio et patria`
concerns, when this should never have been,but yet it is still most
hypocretically evident.
The situation has worsened as the cases of issues appertaining to couples
that are not married, to children born out of wedlock [ almost 30% according
to official statistics ] ,to DNA Testing, acknowledgement of minors
officially declared to have `unknown` fathers, false details or lack
of them in Birth Certificates, married fathers being burdened with children
that are not theirs plus the six months legal limit to file proceedings
denying paternity, abusive obtainment of Garnishee & Inhibition
Warrants, lack of coordination between sections in the Family Court
Registry, inadequate number of Family Court Judges [ currently there
are a meagre two and both of them have to carry out other judicial duties
outside their Family Court assignments !! ], all these and more are
on the increase while the inefficiencies in the Family Court Organization
are ever more augmenting because there is not a committed commitment
on the part of the authorities to seriously remedying the catastrophic
situation. Patching and attempting to fill the many gaping holes that
emerge regularly is not a solution, as is well-known.
A study has to be made relating to the role of Experts, Legal Referees,and
Judicial Assistants which have become in the case of the first two categories
a lucrative financial source for the individuals benefitting. The bills
for instance for evaluating immovable property for community of acquests
purpose are being grossly exaggerated. Because of a lack of a judicially-coordinated
procedure strategy,lots of sessions with Legal Referees are pure waste
of time for which sessions the contending parties have to pay. Too many
accounting is coming into play from some well-known sources who are
applying Financial Services Principles to the married life of couples
throwing the latter into unnecessary expenses. The Court should curtail
and control these abuses.
Again,the emergence of the Family Criminal Court is a busy thorough
fare that requires delicate handling and coordination with the civil
side of the Family Court. Because of matrimonial conflicts a number
of individuals found themselves before the Family Criminal Court, imprisoned
for not paying maintenance to an adulterous wife for instance, or facing
accusations of domestic violence with the ulterior objective truly being
to have a positive judgement which will serve as a basis to evict someone
from the conjugal home. We tend to focus on Domestic Violence without
examining the ulterior reasons as to why this is on the increase: the
above
is a principal cause and we are doing nothing to halt this regressive
move in the increasing downfall of married life.These are the issues
that must not only be examined and spoken about publicly by influential
persons [ such as the Chief Justice ], but carefully considered conclusions
have to be drawn to provide a remedy.
Lacking the legal structure to dissolve a marriage is another fatal
flaw which the competent authorities are terrified apparently of facing.
The truthful scenario has long emerged; yet we do not grasp it and implement
realistic remedies. We allow an atrocious legal scandal to keep mining
the independence of our Courts in Annulment matters, as occurred on
March 1st,1995, with a subversive amendment to the 1975 Marriage Act.
The authorities have thus aided and abetted the confusion in the Family
Court to augment in matters that relate to the antiquated institution
of Annulments where nobody actually resorts to it formally in the rest
of the world.Divorce locally has thus to be introduced, as persons involved
want to get on with their precious lives. Hence the competent authorities
are to blame for not providing a legal remedy to the countless marriages
breaking down among us,where as a result - proportionally - Malta has
the highest number of legal or de facto separations in the EU, apart
from having also the pole position in the jungle habitat of co habitations
that are flourishing with an ever-rising rhythm among us.
With this desolate, factual picture, it is useless to attempt to discuss
the many shortcomings of our Family Court when the State [ and no other
Institution has any business to get or be tolerated to get involved
] is not providing the legal remedies and proper infra structure to
halt this social rot which has engulfed us already. Hence let us not
try and find the scape goats,merely admit the Mea Culpa: sic et sempliciter!
Dr Emmy Bezzina is a well-known Family Law lawyer with 33 years
private practice behind him.