|
Defending
the Right to Believe Differently
Abdul Wahid Pedersen
Imam, General Association of Muslims in Denmark
We
are living in a world today where the necessity of having a cross-religious
dialogue becomes ever more evident. A few decades ago, the world did not
move as fast as today, and most religions were to some extent nearly permanent
in each their place. A country like Denmark was pretty much mono-religious,
and the meeting of religions was merely theoretical.
This changed in Denmark, as it did in so many other countries in the second
half of the twentieth century, when migration around the globe intensified
dramatically. Cultures and religions started meeting all over the world,
causing people not only to look at the state of their own religion but
also recognize that other religions had come into the neighborhood.
New challenges faced the traditional European populations, especially
in the form of the so-called new religions plus the massive immigration
of Islam. Initially, the new religions drew the most attention and bore
the brunt of the attacks by the press. No efforts were spared in portraying
them as being an evil force within society; their followers were classified
as brainwashed and their beliefs were ridiculed.
In the same years, Islam was slowly gaining foothold in the West. In those
days Islam was considered rather exotic with the faint odor of A Thousand
and One Nights. Muslims were invited into Europe to take the jobs on the
factory floors that nobody else wanted, and they were loyal and good workers
wit only a peripheral affiliation with their own religion initially. When
they started settling in, getting married and establishing families, religion
became important within these new minority groups in Europe.
And then the tides shifted. The Soviet bloc collapsed, the political landscape
of the world changed, and nothing remained what it was. Within a few years,
Islam was named the “enemy” of the Western world and a regular
race seemed to begin. From even the seat of NATO and the European Union,
the idea was voiced that Islam was posing a threat to the old Europe.
Muslim minorities in Europe became the target for the negative profiling
in the media, and the new religions were left in peace.
For more than a decade, in some countries close to fifteen years, there
has been a verbal war on Islam in the media, and Muslims in Europe have
felt increasingly uncomfortable with the development. My own country,
Denmark, has to some extent been in the very forefront of negative profiling
of Islam and Muslims. Fiercely led by extreme right-wing politicians,
the debate has become so poisonous that it brought the world to a major
crisis in the early part of 2006. A series of drawings, which in themselves
not were particularly much worse than what has been seen at several occasions
throughout history, set half the world ablaze.
Before the case was over, several people had died.
This was a lesson for the whole world, and particularly for Denmark. It
showed with shocking clarity that the Western world had a very important
lesson to learn. It had to learn that things have indeed changed for good,
and that we have to learn not only to live together but also at least
to accept the presence of each other and, preferably, even respect the
other. The cartoon crisis emerged from the unwillingness to accept facts
at face value and live in the understanding that the world of today and
tomorrow are not the same as the world of yesterday.
In today’s and tomorrow’s world the society is neither mono-cultural
nor mono-religious. We have to realize that wherever we go in the new
world, we will meet people of faiths other than our own and that they
have just as much right to have their religion as each one of us feel
that we have for ours. This may be a difficult exercise, and it could
take time to learn. Nevertheless, it is of crucial importance that we
not only recognize it but actually set out to make it happen. At present,
the lack of willingness to respect and honor the rights of everybody else’s
religion is tearing our planet apart nearly faster than we can manage
to do it in so many other ways.
Therefore, it has been important for me to share in some of the interreligious
events staged by the Unification Church or the Universal Peace Federation.
One of the things which has pleased me greatly in this company is the
opportunity to speak out openly and clearly. Thus, I have openly stated
that I come as a Muslim, I speak as a Muslim and I leave as a Muslim.
The only response to this has been “That is exactly what you are
expected to do.” There have been no attempts to convince me to change
my religion.
One of the things that has truly impressed me has been the willingness
of Rev. Moon and his movement to include Muslims. In a time when Muslims
have been labeled the scum of the earth from left, right and centre, it
has been refreshing to find that there has been a deliberate outreach
of dialogue with Muslims, even immediately after the tragic incident at
9/11. Shortly after that tragedy, I was, along with other Muslim leaders,
invited by Mr. Moon to share in a big conference on Islam and world peace
in Jakarta. And although it did not change the world, it was one of many
important steps taken around the globe in order to alleviate the stigmatizing
of all Muslims on the basis of the acts of a very few.
Numerous times, I have been in great gatherings with religious leaders
from all over the world, each one speaking openly about his own concerns
for the present world. I have even had the great chance to speak to a
congregation of about 400 people of all different faiths in front of the
Western Wall in Jerusalem just beneath the Masjid al Aqsa, which is the
third holiest place in Islam.
For many years I have been active in interreligious work in Denmark as
well as internationally, and I have met a lot of sincere and concerned
people who willingly and readily embrace each other across religious boundaries.
This is a new discipline for a lot of people from the Western world, my
self including. We have had to learn every step from scratch. Slowly but
surely, we are coming through, and even as we see that at the extreme
edges there are forces trying to pull everything apart, it also seems
that an ever increasing number of people are trying to go that extra mile
to meet each other in the no-man’s-land between religions, the land
where we can all respect each other for having belief and having the courage
to express it in a chaotic world. Moreover, these people have the courage
to reach out to believers who profess other faiths.
It is tremendously important that we clearly start voicing the opinion
that all have the right to profess their belief and that we will even
fight for each others’ rights to have a belief or not to have it.
If I am not ready and willing to stand up for anybody else’s right,
then I certainly should not expect anybody to stand up for me. Thus, as
a Muslim in a modern world, I am glad to state that, first of all, I am
convinced that (for me) my own religious choice is right and that the
way I have taken is right. Otherwise, I would naturally change it immediately.
Second, I am glad to state that I am absolutely ready and willing to defend
anybody else’s right to have their religion, even if I may strongly
disagree with their belief.
|
|